welcome

Welcome To Tory Hoose

Tory Hoose is a new chapter in progressive thinking and conservatism within Scotland, a grassroots and independent alternative to the party machines. What sets Toryhoose apart from other centre right Scottish blogs More »

Fewer Councils? More Councils?

It comes as no surprise to me that senior officials within Local Government would rather see fewer Councils as reported widely today. Grant Thornton has done a survey of senior officials within Councils and 40% of them would prefer to see fewer councils.

You have to ask why this is the case - would it be in their interests for this to happen. A reorganisation of local authority boundaries would undoubtedly lead to senior officer redundancies, so why do 40% of turkeys seem to want Christmas to come.

It comes down to a wish to see big complex local authorities free from operational meddling from politicians. In the world of the "perfect" council strategic direction would come from the Council and officers would be free to implement whatever actions they see fit to meet that strategy. This gives Councillors the role of a non-executive director.

What this misses is the fact that Councillors are never judged at the ballot box by the strategies that they have pursued, but by the results people live with.

Fewer local authorities makes them bigger and more complex with council policy further removed from the reality of operational council services. Writing a waste services strategy that makes sure Mrs Smith gets her bins picked up on time is easier when you can understand the entire operation, not when it involves half a million households and a budget in the Billions.

Local accountability also must play a part. Not all of Scotland's local authorities have a common shared identity - in my authority people in the north of the area still describe themselves as being in Perthshire. Even so, the closer the people are to the level that decisions about their lives are being taken, the more likely that they will be able to influence it.

Saying that it is very wasteful to have 32 HR services, 32 IT departments etc. This is why schemes like the West of Scotland Shared Services agreement are so hopeful. We in Stirling share our IT department with Clackmanshire and are well on the way to sharing our Social Care and Education Departments.

One might ask why there is not a consortium of HR, IT and other support services that Councils can bid into and get services from. But then, this has always been politically problematice given how much socialism there is in Scottish Local Government. It is essential that Conservatives stand up for value and the best way for value to be achieved is through shared services.

So lets look behind the survey and who do we see... Grant Thornton who now claim that there is an appetite for structural reform in Scottish Local government. With the Christie Commission ruling out structural change and no political will for change, who do they think they are kidding?

 

People may ask why there is a picture of Glasgow City Chambers on the heading of this article - but it is the largest and most complex of the local authorities in Scotland. Does that make it the best?

Review of Catholic Schools in Borders Underway

Borders Council have announced that they will be reviewing their Catholic School provision. The authority has a low number of pupils in denominational schooling and how it will be delivered across such a wide rural council will no doubt be a hot potato. The review punts the issue to after the election next year.

Cameron Rose: Trams – Here we go again

Councillor Cameron Rose represents the Southside & Newington Ward on Edinburgh City Council

 

The story so far.  In 2008 Edinburgh Council signed a fixed price contract for £512m to deliver a tram from the Airport to Newhaven (including moving the underground utilities).  The qualification was that the cost was 95% fixed.  Indeed, the £512m included extra payments to the contractor to bring the risk down to 5%.

Well,  here we are in 2011 and Edinburgh has today approved a tram from the Airport to St Andrews Square at an estimated cost of £776m .  The report on which today's decision is based makes it clear that this time there are no such guarantees that £776m will be the final figure.

Let me summarise my position.

First, I supported (and still support) the principle of trams.  Edinburgh is a growing city with both resident population and visitor numbers increasing. Improvements in our transport infrastructure are to be welcomed.  Trams improve efficiency where there are large numbers of people to be moved.  (There was a record of almost 1 million passengers through Edinburgh airport in July).

Second, I have supported the project.  There are however, three key issues which bring us to the current position.

  1. It is widely accepted that the contract governing the project is full of holes and in the disputes over its implementation, the Council has been on the wrong side of many of the judgements.  The contract is widely regarded as a liability.
  2. The project management has been a disaster (the delivery arm Transport Initiatives Edinburgh is already all but closed down).
  3. The project has suffered from a lack of leadership.  Councillors were unable to maintain effective oversight and a divided administration sent the wrong signals

With the current figure of £776m to take the tram to St Andrew Square only, there is not even a '95% guarantee' that costs will not escalate further.  So what to do?

On offer have been three broad options.  The first is the current decision to plough on to St Andrews Square. The second is to get out of the contract (broadly in agreement with the contractor) after delivery of the line to Haymarket (about 60% of the full line distance).  The third is to terminate the contract with a view to total cancellation or re procurement.  This would have been subject to negotiation.

Last week in the final vote I voted for the Haymarket option because it offered, with little risk, a clean end to the contractual disputes and ownership of a working asset.  Comparisons of revenue losses for that option against predicted revenue profits for the the St Andrews Square option suffered from a problem with the credibility of the figures.  In any case that annual deficit, had it materialised, needs to be considered against the very considerable uncertainties of the costs of the St Andrews Square option which still seems too much like a blank cheque. And the extensive borrowing that entails.

Today I voted for negotiation for termination of the contract.  Certainly there are unknowns with what that figure would be after negotiation.  But they are likely to be a much lower figure than the current course to St Andrews Square with all its uncertainties.

Actually, I hope I was wrong and that a line from the Airport to St Andrews Square is up and running in short order for less than £776m.  But the history of the project and the evidence before us now doesn't look promising.

 

 

A Scottish Conservative Future or not? That is the question!

With less than two months until d-day for the leadership campaign, an issue that is appearing to dominate the campaign in its early days is the future of our party. Now this issue is one that is bigger than any MSP, MP, member or activist. This is an issue that has divided the party for a number of years and one that may or may not increase are chances to gain a larger pool of conservative voters in Scotland.

Since the devastating result in 1997, where we lost all of our MP’s, the Scottish Conservatives have continued to hit a downward trend with regards to membership and election wins. What has caused this to happen?

Different members of the party and those external will give you very different responses, my idea is a simple…we have failed to engage with the voters, failed to explain to them what we stand for and who we are!

Looking at the party from the outside we are seen as upper class businessmen & women, as Lords or Ladys, land owners, lawyers and the higher classes within society. In truth we are as mixed as the rest of the parties in Scotland today. Yes we have those groups previously stated supporting us however we also have a large amount of people from various different backgrounds, religions, and races. We have students, lawyers, nurses, teachers, big issue sellers, social workers, youth workers, directors, accountants, Muslims, Catholics, Protestants, Asians, French, and British people supporting our party.

So what we need to start doing is listening to the experiences of our members and activities, stop thinking that our MSP’s and staff know best and begin to draw up a set of concrete policies and start effectively presenting them to the general public through a motivate leader that the average Joe on the street can relate to. Only by doing this will we start to win elections.

Regardless of who wins the leadership elections one thing is clear, our party as we know it will change and I hope that change will be a modern, fresh thinking, equal to all party that the people of Scotland will be able to install their trust onto again.

£1m cash book for enterprising pupils in East Ayrshire.

Business and Skills Enterprise Centers (BESC) across East Ayrshire are being given £1m cash boost in order to encourage entrepreneurial qualities and to get more schools leavers into work, or training.

With the likes of Sir Tom Hunter, one of Scotland’s richest men backing the initiative, it is important that East Ayrshire schools use this money to the full potential and the skills and experiences that top businessmen and woman can bring to the development of Ayrshire’s young people.

With the £1m coming from a one off grant from the council, schools will be expected to come up with their own ways of funding after the money has run out if they wish to sustain the learning and training programmes.

Other business leaders involved with this initiative include Mark Strudwick, chief executive of the Princes Scottish Youth Business Trust, Craig Stevenson from Norman Drummond of Drummond International and Columba 1400, Peter Hughes, chief executive of Scottish Engineering.

This is a great opportunity for the young people of East Ayrshire to engage in. Developing in the skills and knowledge required to be excellent entrepreneurs will enable our young people to be amongst the best business leaders in Scotland and hopefully in years to come the area will see benefits from this investment through the creation of local companies which in turn would bring jobs and wealth to East Ayrshire.

Both the SNP and Scottish Conservative Councillors back this proposal however once again the Labour Councillors have put up opposition to these proposals saying the money could be better spent. This is a typical response from Labour who seem to think businesses are not important to the future growth of our communities. Labour would happily see the money being spend on more public services which in turn would not create growth in our communities.

Ruth Davidson announces Leadership bid

Glasgow MSP Ruth Davidson has confirmed she will stand as a candidate in the Scottish Conservative leadership contest.

The long awaited official announcement sees Davidson, at 32 the youngest of the three contenders, join Jackson Carlaw and Murdo Fraser in the bid to replace Annabel Goldie who steps down in the Autumn.

Davidson is expected to formally launch her campaign on Thursday (8th Sept) .

 

Fraser unveils ‘radical’ plans in Leadership bid message

Murdo Fraser got the Sunday headline writers to hold the front page when he sent out his pre-campaign launch last Saturday night (3rd Sept).  In it, he tells of his plans to launch a new, progressive, centre-right party with a distinct Scottish identity. One that would have a partnership with the UK Conservative Party, and in other respects be operationally independent.

Murdo’s pre-launch email in full:

 

Dear colleague,

A new party for Scotland

As you will be aware, I announced my candidacy for leadership of the Scottish Conservative & Unionist Party at the end of last week. Since then, I have been delighted to receive support from leading Party figures such as Elizabeth Smith MSP, Struan Stevenson MEP, Alex Johnstone MSP, Rt Hon Alex Fergusson MSP and Gavin Brown MSP, along with many senior councillors, activists and ordinary members. I have also set out my views on ‘New Unionism’ as the best way to defeat the SNP’s plans to break up our United Kingdom.

I am holding my campaign launch on Monday (05th Sept) and I am writing in advance of that to let you know about a major announcement I will be making about the future of our Party should I be successful in the leadership election. I know many of you share my frustration about the continued decline in our support notwithstanding all our collective efforts. Scotland has many centre-right voters who will not support our Party because it lacks a distinct Scottish identity. We have to change, and change fundamentally, if we are to win them back.

So I will, on Monday, make it clear the direction in which I wish to take the Party. If I am elected as Leader, I will build a new and stronger party for Scotland. A new party, a winning party with new supporters from all walks of life, a new belief in devolution, a new name, and, most importantly, a new positive message about the benefits of staying in and strengthening the United Kingdom.

I will be setting out my vision in more detail on Monday at my campaign launch, but given that there will be a great deal of media interest in my proposals I wanted to make sure you knew what I am suggesting before you read about in the papers. Elizabeth Smith, my Campaign Manager, has written a piece setting my proposed changes in context, and this is pasted below. I am sure that you will have a lot of questions about the detail of what I am proposing and I will endeavour to answer these in the coming days. However, I hope that you will agree that these are exciting plans for the much-needed revival of progressive, centre-right politics in Scotland.

For the avoidance of doubt, may I make it very clear that my proposals refer to the period beyond the forthcoming Scottish council elections. It would not be appropriate to make these changes ahead of these council elections given the fact that that electoral process is already underway.

With very best wishes,

Murdo Fraser

 

Elizabeth Smith writes:

Murdo Fraser has got what it takes

Like all of my colleagues and every other Conservative voter in the recent Scottish Election, I was bitterly disappointed at the outcome. Make no mistake about the extent of that disappointment or about the deep-seated frustration which accompanies it, because, whether we like it or not, we have consistently failed to get our act fully together when it comes to making electoral progress. And, I know I speak for a large number of people, both inside and outside the party, when I say that enough is enough.

There is only one option open to us, and that is to be brutally honest with ourselves about why we are not doing better, act upon it, and change – for good.

The first stage in that process has been the Sanderson Review which has opened up new channels for some very plain speaking. And plenty of plain speaking there has been; about our party organisation, leadership structures, about policy-making and campaigning and about our inability to broaden our appeal. The findings of the review have been a salutary lesson, which tell us that all the previous attempts at revival have not worked. Put simply; if you don’t get the votes, you will not win elections.

That first stage – an accurate diagnosis if you like – was extremely important. There is little hope of moving forward if you can’t admit to the problems. The second stage, however, is even more important, and that is the current leadership campaign which follows the decision of Annabel Goldie to stand down this autumn. This campaign gives the party exactly the right opportunity to debate what we do now; how we can become a modern and effective force in Scottish politics that will once again capture the public’s imagination.

For me, three things matter. Firstly, our party needs to be capable of winning again, Secondly, it needs to attract voters from a much wider cross-section of Scottish society, and, thirdly, there needs to be a clear commitment to and vision about how we will strengthen the United Kingdom.

One of these things on its own is not enough. We need to achieve all three, and to do so, I believe we need to be radical in our approach; not more of the same, and hoping that, given time, “our time will come” in the opinion polls. Because the blunt message is – and we all need to understand this – that they won’t, unless we can prove we have really changed and that we fully understand the dynamics of modern Scottish politics. And these dynamics are changing fast in terms of the size of the economic challenge, a new Scotland Bill, the forthcoming referendum and the need for reform of our public services.

Over the last few months, like many other colleagues, I have thought long and hard about the future. I have talked to many people both inside and outside the party and a very large number of them tell me they want radical change. As a result, I declared my support for Murdo Fraser.

Why? Because I believe he has the radical agenda which can once again make us a strong force in Scottish politics; not just in the words or the spin that might see him get elected leader, but because of a firm commitment to a radical new agenda. At the heart of this agenda is the creation of a new, progressive centre right party in Scotland which has at its core our values of freedom, responsibility and decentralisation, but also capable of attracting a much wider support across all walks of life in Scotland.

That party will also be built around the concept of new unionism: around the fact that devolution and a stronger United Kingdom are not mutually exclusive, but, instead, are a coherent political strategy that will ensure nationalism can be defeated once and for all and ensure that we are capable of sending many more MPs to Westminster to support a Conservative Government.

We need to build a more successful Scotland which will be more attractive to business, to entrepreneurs and to all those who know that we must do more to improve the delivery of our public services and reward those who work hard and who pay their taxes. We need to reform our education system, the delivery of our health services; we need to ensure the provision of local government services gives better value for money and we need to ensure Scotland is open for business.

Murdo’s passion and conviction impress me, he has very considerable political and parliamentary experience, formidable debating powers which are recognised by the media and the other parties in the Scottish Parliament, as well as by the general public; and these are debating skills which, I believe, will prove vitally important especially at the time of a crucial referendum on Scotland’s future.

Leadership of any political party is not easy. It takes courage and vision; it takes experience and good judgment. I have no doubt there are others who could do a good job, but for me, and, I know, for many others, Murdo has got what it takes to make us electable again and I very much hope you will join me in supporting him.

Elizabeth Smith

Highland Councillor Kicked Out

Councillor John Holden the former Labour Councillor for Inverness South in Highland Council was jailed recently for Benefit Fraud. The future of his council seat was unclear as he had lodged a number of appeals. According to the Lochaber News he was receiving his salary until last week, but has now been removed from the Council.

Conservatives were in 5th place in 1st preference votes at the election in 2007 (it is a 4 member ward). While a by-election victory is a tough fight, it could be a useful opportunity to put resources into a ward which holds some promise for the future.

Kilmarnock & Loudoun Conservatives selection their 2012 wining team!

Members of the Kilmarnock & Loudoun Conservative Association turned out in large numbers to select their winning team for the 2012 Council Elections. Those selected include:

Ward 1: Annick – Cllr Rose-ann Cuninghame

Ward2: Kilmarnock North – Ian Grant

Ward 3: Kilmarnock West & Crosshouse – Cllr Tom Cook

Ward 4: Kilmarnock East & Hurlford – Rob Murray

Ward 5: Kilmarnock South – Jamie Sampson

Ward 6: Irvine Valley – John McFadzean

It was with great regret that Provost Stephanie Young (Conservative Cllr for Irvine Valley) indicated that she would be standing down at the next election after many years of dedicated service to the people of East Ayrshire and to the Scottish Conservative party. She will be dearly missed!

So information on all the candidates and up-dates on their campaigns please visit www.klconservatives.org.uk

We should structure the party on local authority boundaries.

For too many years, the Scottish Conservatives have found their campaigns disjointed and with horrid lurch between elections starting and stopping. A major factor in this has been the disparity between constituencies at Holyrood and Westminster campaigns. This results in area’s switching between being target seats, to being neglected. This disjointed campaigning has been one factor in the Tories lack of progress at constituency level, and has become an irritating distraction for associations and volunteers. But there is an alternative.

Conservatives have made solid progress at local government level, and there is a key link between success at local government and winning constituencies on election night. The Lib Dem’s have had a history of translating local government success into electoral prizes in Westminster and by-elections. The SNP has also shown that a strong local government base provides a great spring board to wider success.

Centrally the party has become too occupied with a handful of target seats at elections, highlighting where the opposition parties should target anti-tory resources. This also results in vast swathes of Scotland with almost no campaigning, where candidates and associations are left floundering with limited resources which is both disheartening and damaging to the party-especially in regional list votes in Holyrood elections.

It seems logical that the party should restructure around local government boundaries. This would reduce the number of constituency associations down to 32, concentrating resources and allowing a more streamlined and dynamic campaign machine.

By pooling of funding and campaign resources in this way it would allow more professional agents to be employed and more party offices could be opened. The result of this would be to create a situation where campaigns can be better coordinated and managed. Resources can be focused on making progress across Scotland, where even Glasgow elects Conservatives at local government level. This would mean area’s with limited resources would be able to target their winnable areas, and build up a stronger base for making progress at Holyrood and Westminster.

Yes constituencies do cross local boundaries at Holyrood elections, but this would still result in fewer seats being shared between associations than the current structure which can currently result in seats split between up to 4 associations. It would allow a greater link between the association exec to the area’s the are campaigning, and result no area having no active association to support candidates.

Local government success is key to the party’s Scottish comeback, hard working conservative councillors are the most effective way shift perceptions of the party. It makes sense that the party should have a structure to reflect this, one that encourages progress rather than stifles it.